Thursday, April 30, 2009

RE: Spiritual Movements - the HIGH ROAD structure

Have you ever walked into a building and your jaw just dropped in awe? The pure grandeur of the space instilling a sense of wonder. You find yourself whispering under your breath, "how in the world did they do this?"

During the past Olympics, I got to vacation in Beijing, China and had the opportunity to stroll with the masses through the Forbidden City. As I ambled through the immense complex I had a number of those moments. There was just too much detail to take in. I couldn't decide if I wanted to take pictures of the sweeping views or zoom in on the gold leafed hand painted claw of the dragons that adorned every wooden beam.

The Forbidden City is a perfect example of a HIGH ROAD structure.

Reputed to have had 9,999 rooms, it was completed in 1420 after 15 years of construction. Through a series of gates the palace has a stone road running north and south where only the feet of the Emperor could walk.

Characteristics common to HIGH ROAD structures such as the Forbidden City are:

beautiful........................... it is a UN World Heritage site.
complex........................... 9,999 rooms (enough said).
carefully crafted............... 1 million workers took 15 years.
constant maintenance..... most recent renovation is taking 18 years.

In his book, How Buildings Learn, Brand remarks that HIGH ROAD buildings are structures that "become highly evolved, refinement added to refinement, the sensible parts kept, the humorous parts kept, the clever idea that didn't work thrown away, the overly ambitous... torn down, the loved view maintained... the measure of successful evolution is intricate vivacity."

That sounds really nice in a luxurious sort of way, but Brand continues.
There are substantial disadvantages as well to life in a High Road building. Occupants in a lean time can be crushed by trying to maintain what was built in fat times. The High Road is high-visibility, often high-style, nearly always high-cost.

While I will grant you that HIGH ROAD buildings were usually designed and built to service the needs of the occupants at the time, as it ages it tends to preserve/protect the past rather than adjust to newly realized needs.

Can you imagine how much work it took to install plumbing and electricity in the Forbidden City while keeping true to its ancient mystique? For a more modern example check out this project by This Old House to refit a NYC rowhouse and their unique challenges to balance the history of the place with the desire to bring it into the 21st Century.

Brand summarizes it well by pointedly stating that, "the sustained complexity of High Road buildings leads in the fullness of time to rich specialization. They cannot help becoming unique."

As I type this post I cannot help thinking about words such as Monument and Museum. Most of the examples in How Buildings Learn for High Road buildings are just that, monuments to and museums for the past - Chatsworth House, Salisbury Cathedral, Monticello, Mount Vernon, Library of Congress, and the Tor House.

In an address to the Acts 29 church planting network, Mark Driscoll talked about this same phenomenon within the church. How many churches have you entered and the walls are lined with pictures from the past and stories of glory long gone?

I distinctly remember attending an infamous business meeting at my childhood church. One member was in the minority opinion on a certain contentious issue, but he specifically told the assembled congregation that his vote should count more than others because his family name was on the cornerstone of the church. Uh... I thought there was only one cornerstone of the church? Talk about HIGH ROAD!

A few questions to reflect on. Please post your musings.

1. What examples of HIGH ROAD architecture do you see in Scripture?

2. What was the purpose of that environment in terms of people's lives and connection to God?

3. Is a HIGH ROAD environment conducive to multiplying spiritual movements?

In my next post we will explore how High Road styles are often used to create spiritual environments.

It's time to flip the switch on this one.

Until next time,


100W

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

RE: Spiritual Movements - Lessons from Architecture

I'm finished with reading leadership books for awhile.  Not that I have read a lot of them, nor am an expert in the art and science of leadership, but I have read enough of them to...
  • know what I don't know.
  • know what I should know.
  • know what I need to do about it.
At this point it is all about application and execution and for that I just need some time and accountability.

But "Leaders are readers" so I have, instead, immersed myself into other genres and am looking for lessons in random and unrelated places.  

Back in the late 90's I had a friend who was studying architecture. I asked him, "what is the ONE book that I should read to appreciate and understand your discipline?"

Without hesitation he recommended How Buildings Learn by futurist/inventor/designer Stewart Brand.  

The purpose of Brand's book is to "examine buildings as a whole - not just whole in space, but whole in time".  He seeks to observe the relationship between a defined space and the people that inhabit that space.  Their relationship creates an environment that can be either liberating or suffocating.

Take a look around you right now.  

How does the space you are in make you feel?  

Does it support what you want to do or does it dictate to you what can be done?  

My place comes with cement walls so it takes an inordinate amount of work to make one small change.

A few months ago I wanted to drill a hole to anchor a picture frame.  Even with a pneumatic drill I couldn't penetrate more than a centimeter.  Turns out it was steel reinforced cement that encased the elevator shaft. I found another place for the picture.

I bought How Buildings Learn over ten years ago, but am now just getting back to it. I am glad I didn't pick it up any earlier since I only now really have any hooks on which to hang these principles.  

There is so much talk around the world about spiritual movements and these movements are often launched and led by churches and organizations.  

But what I find myself asking more and more is, "can an entity like that give appropriate support to a movement without suffocating it?"

In the next few posts I will take a look at three types of buildings that Brand talks about- HIGH, LOW, and NO ROAD - and apply it to spiritual movements and the ways that an organization can either release or restrict it.

Before signing off, here are a few questions to set the baseline for our discussion.

1. What three words would you use to describe a Movement?

2. What environment is needed to see a Movement attain critical mass?

3. What environment is needed to support and multiply a Movement?

4. Do you think Organization and Movement can coexist in the same space?

Time to turn out the light for today.  Until the next post...

100W